Tallulah:
In my opinion, it feels quite good when the person gets punished after they’ve hurt me, but I know once their punishment’s over and they come back out, nothing’s changed. So my conclusion is that no matter how good it feels when they get in trouble, it won’t change how they feel about you.
Luke:
I don’t think people should be punished for what they did. I think people should talk about it so they can work out their issues/problems.
If you do this they will understand what they did and it won’t happen again.
But if you punish them they will just get more angry and do it again because they think that’s their ticket to do it again, but the feelings about the other person are still there.
Gemma:
When I had a fight earlier this year, we first didn’t want to sort it out by talking, but instead of punishment, which isn’t cool, we decided to talk it out, and now we’re on an okay basis.
Kenny:
I think the restorative method works better because if you punish a kid they will do what ever they did after the detention. If the person who has done something has a chance to talk about it to the victim, they can sort it out so it doesn’t happen again.
Alex:
I think that talking and sorting it out is better than just getting a detention and having to write out 5 pages of the dictionary or something like that. But sorting it out can be very stressful on teachers and in some cases even harder for the student to front up to what they have done. So students just want to be punished sometimes because they don’t want to face what they have done. If they don’t sort it out it’s more likely to happen again.
Jack H:
I think talking about the problem is better than not doing anything to help the problem between the two people.
If they got punished again and again for doing the same thing they will soon get used to the same punishment happening and not learn anything. However if they were to talk about it with adults, the adults could find out the problem and resolve it rather than punishing them again and again.
Quinn:
I think that punishments are good and bad. They’re good because depending on what the punishment is it could make them regret what they have done or if it is something simple then they will think they will get punished and then do it again because the punishment is easy and they get use to it and they find ways to make it shorter.
I think that it would be harder for the person to face up to the victim and say they’re sorry and think of something they could do to make them not do it again and then say what it was.
Eric:
I think that the restorative method works best because if you punish a kid, he/she will get angry at the one that told on them and will want revenge.
The restorative method asks why you did the crime so that the victim and the criminal can know what they both felt and the criminal will want no vengeance or anything like that.
Hunter:
When I had a fight at my old school no one knew about it except my friends. I wanted to tell my teacher but I had a feeling that I was going to go to detention. I told my teacher and he said to me, “Did you win?” and I was like, “Serious?” and he said to me, “What are you going to do about it?” so I went to his class and I had to talk to him and we were friends again. If I had just had a detention, he would still be wanting an apology.
Taylor:
Punishment:
Isn’t helping anyone whatsoever.
No one’s learning from their mistakes.
If teachers keep on giving unfit punishments, children keep giving unfit responses, and so on.
No one’s apologising or forgiving, so then the child that is getting no justice thinks that they can’t defend themselves because the offender will keep offending because they think it’s okay to do so.
It’s bad because then parents ring school thinking that their child got no justice and wanting the bully to get an especially harsh punishment, which the bully will do then bully the boy again (full circle).
Restorative punishment:
I think that this is a better approach because the naughty kid will feel guilty and silly when they apologise to the kid that they hurt, and the kid that is getting apologised to will be pleased that they are getting a sincere apology that the kid is embarrassed by... meaning that the bully won’t want to do that again.
The bully won’t like it so they will stop (problem solved).
If the kid does something that involves the class, most of the time they have to get up in front of the class and apologise = complete embarrassment = kid not wanting to do that again.
CONCLUSION:
Punishment = Kids not caring about what they have done and think it’s okay to do it again.
Restorative punishment= kids feeling embarrassed when they apologise and not wanting to do that again = everyone happy.
What it feels like being a victim:
When I am a victim then I always like to think I am going to get a sincere apology from that person and then we can both move on.
If the person received a punishment then they could just keep hurting me and I couldn’t do much about it.
21 September 2010
Restorative versus Punitive Methods - Which works the best?
Posted by Room 4 at 9:22 PM 0 comments
Labels: punitive, restorative practice
11 August 2010
Breaks
Posted by Anonymous at 3:53 AM 0 comments
Labels: Activity, Breaks, Concentration, Michael Irwin
22 June 2010
FIFA World Cup
Italy are a world class team but they can’t handle being beaten by an underdog, so they faked getting pulled down so they could have a penalty. That is bad enough, but they practise it, which is even worse. The ref was from Guatemala and he would have seen that it was a Hollywood but he let it off. But they are the real losers.
Jack M
The world cup is on and I’m excited. So far, I’ve been watching all but one game.
I don’t think the All Whites are going to win the cup, but we can get our rank better. We just drew with Italy and they’re ranked fifth, and we’re ranked seventy-eight. The other team I’m backing is Brazil and Portugal. I’m backing Portugal because it’s got some of my favourite players, like Ronaldo.
Luke
First of all, I didn’t actually know anything about the World Cup until my teacher showed us a video of our All Whites soccer team versing Italy. Then I went home and saw it all over the news! Once I starting understanding what all the fuss was about I became pretty proud. I think we did an amazing job, but I think Italy only got a point from a false penalty. Go the All Whites!
Oceana
Everyone arrived to watch the soccer World Cup. Everyone was buzzing with excitement as they entered the field. They were versing Italy. After a few minutes they started. Then suddenly, they were close to the goal, then, all of a sudden they shot. “Yeah!” Everybody was going crazy with excitement. They were taking their tops off and waving them around. The only way Italy got a goal was by a penalty when one of the All Whites, touched an Italy person and he pretended to fall over.
Julia
I was quite surprised to see New Zealand’s scores against Italy and Slovakia. Sure, 1 – 1 in both of these games doesn’t mean a win or a loss, it’s a draw, but before the cup even started, I saw somewhere on a late night show on the tele that they wouldn’t win and the chances were very slim. Their opinion was pretty logical since New Zealand’s sport is rugby. You can’t go to any town without a rugby team. Anyway, “Whoooo, soccer!”
Jack H
As the All Whites walked on the field to face Italy we had no idea about who was going to win. Goal!!! Shane Smeltz had just scored. The crowd was going wild, tops flying everywhere. They were so happy. They were going to put them out of the FIFA World Cup. But, no, an Italy player did a Hollywood. Free kick. Sadly, it hit the back of the net. One to the All Whites and one to Italy. Well, at least we weren’t out of the World Cup.
Facts:
Italy had 24 shots at goal and only one got in.
New Zealand had 4 shots at goal and one got in.
The All Whites had a celebrating plan for if they scored a goal against Italy but they didn’t do it.
My opinion:
We are going to win the World Cup
Immanuel
I think we did an awesome job at drawing with Italy, but I reckon the only way Italy got a point was because they got a false penalty because the guy pretended to fall over.
Hunter
10 June 2010
Hands-on Fridays
Hands-on Fridays are fun because we can look forward to not doing bookwork on Friday mornings. We can pick things to do that are appropriate to be done at school. Today we’re doing painting and some weeks before we have done origami, rock carving, cooking, like Anzac biscuits and pizzas, and sometimes we just play learning games that we choose. Some people in the olden days think that we should just sit at our desk and do the usual topics – maths, etc, but some teachers now think that we should some have some freedom from the desk. We asked other kids in the class what they thought:
It is fun and we will focus better when it is time to do bookwork so we can look forward to next Friday when we can do more hands-on activities.
There is actually hidden learning in hands-on activities too, like in cooking there is maths, like measuring and fractions. In origami we had to be patient and follow instructions.
It’s fun because it’s different from other days.
It’s a different style of working; we get to use the computers. We get to do art activities, and most of all we get to chose what we do within reason.
It doesn’t feel like work but we learn different things like getting on with each other and making new friends.
You learn better when you are moving around and doing things.
You’re learning and it’s fun, like when you are cutting wood you are learning measurement and angles, and with the painting you are learning rotations and reflections.
Bri-ana and Melissa
Posted by Room 4 at 8:07 PM 1 comments
01 June 2010
e-Portfolios
Posted by Anonymous at 9:10 PM 5 comments
Labels: e-Portfolios, Mahara